Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 30;7:438. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00438

Table 4.

ANOVA results for SNARC effect and ordinal position effect.

DV Effect df1 df2 F p
SNARC (RT) Intercept 1 33 32.01 <0.001
Sequence 2 66 0.26 0.774
Range 1 33 7.11 0.012
Position 1 33 0.09 0.772
Sequence × Range 2 66 0.23 0.799
Sequence × Position 2 66 0.36 0.697
Range × Position 1 33 0.02 0.887
Sequence × Range × Position 2 66 0.36 0.698
Ordinal position (RT) Intercept 1 33 18.38 <0.001
Sequence 2 66 1.83 0.169
Range 1 33 <0.01 0.985
Position 1 33 1.48 0.232
Sequence × Range 2 66 0.17 0.847
Sequence × Position 2 66 0.24 0.790
Range × Position 1 33 0.47 0.496
Sequence × Range × Position 2 66 2.99 0.057
SNARC (ER) Intercept 1 33 17.92 <0.001
Sequence 2 66 1.09 0.341
Range 1 33 0.76 0.389
Position 1 33 0.91 0.348
Sequence × Range 2 66 0.49 0.617
Sequence × Position 2 66 1.08 0.344
Range × Position 1 33 0.01 0.914
Sequence × Range × Position 2 66 1.17 0.318
Ordinal position (ER) Intercept 1 33 31.75 <0.001
Sequence 2 66 6.3 0.003
Range 1 33 1.97 0.169
Position 1 33 0.58 0.450
Sequence × Range 2 66 1.16 0.321
Sequence × Position 2 66 1.33 0.272
Range × Position 1 33 0.81 0.376
Sequence × Range × Position 2 66 0.28 0.758

Resp. side = Response side, Sequence = Sequence length, and Range = Number Range.