Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 10;87(2):169–175. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1126158

Table. 1.

Comparison of the mean size of the ossific nucleus between study groups

No. of hips (% of referrals) Size of ossific nucleus, mm (95% CI) p-value
Treatment
  12 weeks 292 (27) a 9.7 (9.5–10.0) < 0.001 b
  6 weeks 138 (14) 10.1 (9.8–10.4) < 0.001 b
  Reference group 502 (59) 11.3 (11.1–11.5)
  12 weeks, stable hips 67 10.4 (9.9–10.9) 0.002 b
  6 weeks, stable hips 51 10.3 (9.8–10.8) 0.003 b
Clinical findings
  Dislocated 194 9.4 (9.1–9.8) 0.01 c
  Unstable 118 10.1 (9.7–10.4)
  Stable 620 11.1 (10.9–11.3) < 0.001 c
  Ortolani-positive 64 8.7 (8.0–9.3) 0.001 d
  Barlow-positive 130 9.8 (9.4–10.2)
Sex
  Girls, reference group 342 11.6 (11.3–11.9) < 0.001 e
  Boys, reference group 160 10.7 (10.2–11.3)
a

In total, neonatal instability of the hip (NIH) was left-sided in 103 (43%), right-sided in 31 (13%), and bilateral in 105 (44%) of 239 children. In the 152 children with dislocated hips, 60 (39%) were bilateral and 23 (15%) had an unstable contralateral hip. Note that the percentages given relate to all referrals, including those that did not meet inclusion criteria for analysis of the diameter of the ossific nucleus.

b

Comparison with reference group.

c

Comparison with unstable group.

d

Comparison with Barlow-positive.

e

Girls compared to boys in cases with bilaterally stable hips.