Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Optom Vis Sci. 2015 Nov;92(11):1092–1102. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000711

Table 2.

Lens technique divided into age bins (5 years/bin). The mean and standard deviation for the accommodative response, accommodative demand and the accommodative gain (AG) are listed for each condition. AG was calculated by dividing the accommodative response by the accommodative demand for each individual.

Age
(years)
Condition 1 Condition 2 Condition 3 Condition 4 Condition 5 Condition 6*

AG AG AG AG AG AG
5–9 Response 4.97±1.75 0.78±0.11 5.41±1.78 0.75±0.10 6.11±1.58 0.76±0.07 7.00±1.67 0.76±0.07 6.56±2.12 0.67±0.18 6.82±1.28 0.68±0.09
Demand 6.30±1.74 7.15±1.70 8.00±1.66 8.79±1.62 9.58±1.59 9.87±1.11

10–14 Response 4.72±1.51 0.76±0.08 5.32±1.51 0.75±0.07 6.01±1.52 0.76±0.10 6.5±1.45 0.75±0.09 6.60±1.33 0.69±0.07 6.60±1.66 0.64±0.12
Demand 6.14±1.70 6.99±1.66 7.82±1.62 8.63±1.58 9.43±1.55 10.1±1.54

15–19 Response 3.81±1.38 0.73±0.10 4.69±1.33 0.77±0.08 5.32±1.32 0.77±0.07 5.91±1.26 0.76±0.06 5.97±1.41 0.69±0.10 6.06±1.71 0.65±0.13
Demand 5.14±1.50 6.01±1.46 6.87±1.43 7.70±1.40 8.51±1.37 9.23±1.35

20–24 Response 3.82±1.59 0.74±0.13 4.56±1.38 0.77±0.08 5.19±1.39 0.76±0.08 5.66±1.33 0.74±0.07 5.87±1.31 0.69±0.08 5.72±1.45 0.62±0.012
Demand 4.97±1.40 5.84±1.37 6.70±1.34 7.53±1.32 8.34±1.29 9.15±1.27

25–29 Response 3.29±1.04 0.76±0.12 4.03±1.01 0.78±0.09 4.71±1.09 0.78±0.10 5.19±1.05 0.75±0.09 5.11±1.13 0.66±0.1 5.04±1.35 0.59±0.13
Demand 4.19±0.81 5.09±0.79 5.96±0.77 6.81±0.76 7.65±0.74 8.47±0.73

30–35 Response 3.01±1.04 0.76±0.09 3.77±1.04 0.78±0.11 4.38±0.84 0.77±0.06 4.86±0.76 0.74±0.06 4.88±0.75 0.66±0.07 4.79±0.56 0.59±0.05
Demand 3.91±0.99 4.81±0.96 5.68±0.94 6.54±0.92 7.38±0.90 7.38±0.90

(* Note that Conditions 1–5 included subjects that had data for all Conditions from 1–5 (n = 130), whereas Condition 6 included fewer subjects since not all subjects had data for Condition 6 (n = 125)).