Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 3;22(4):410–415. doi: 10.1177/1933719114529376

Table 3.

Haplotype Analysis of miR-146aC > G, miR-149T > C, miR-196a2T > C, and miR-499A > G gene Variants Among Patients With RM and Controls.a

Haplotypes Patients, n = 400 (%) Control, n = 600 (%) OR 95% CI P Value
CTTAb 90 (22.5%) 213 (35.5%)c 0.53 0.39-0.70 .0001c
GTCAc 61 (15.3%) 85 (14.1%)c 1.09 0.76-1.55 .6484
GTTAc 70 (17.5%) 86 (14.3%)c 1.26 0.89-1.78 .1829
GTTG 8 (2.0%) 22 (3.6%) 0.53 0.23-1.21 .1843
CCCAc 35 (8.7%) 56 (9.3%)c 0.93 0.59-1.45 .8227
CTTG 14 (3.5%) 8 (1.3%) 2.68 1.11-6.46 .0274c
CTCAc 26 (6.5%) 55 (9.1%)c 0.68 0.42-1.11 .1555
CTCGc 38 (9.5%) 11 (1.8%) 5.62 2.83-11.13 .0001c
CCTAc 27 (6.7%) 19 (3.1%) 2.21 1.21-4.03 .0128c
GCTA 6 (1.5%) 8 (1.3%) 1.12 0.38-3.27 1.0000
CCTG 2 (0.5%) 10 (1.6%) 0.29 0.06-1.36 .1384
GTCG 11 (2.7%) 18 (3.0%) 0.91 0.42-1.95 .8505
GCCA 3 (0.75%) 9 (1.5%) 0.49 0.13-1.84 .3806
GCTG 8 (2.0%)
CCCG 1 (0.25%)

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; NS, not significant; OR, odds ratio; RM, recurrent miscarriage.

aHaplotypes were generated from multilocus diploid data based on a Gibbs sampling strategy (Arlequin v3.5).

bStatistically significant protective haplotypes.

cThe difference in haplotype frequencies between the case and control groups for the prevalent haplotypes (prevalence more than 5% in either cases or controls) was analyzed for statistical significance using Fisher exact test with Bonferroni correction, and ORs are reported within the 95% confidence limits.

dStatistically significant RM predisposing haplotypes.