Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 30.
Published in final edited form as: Future Microbiol. 2015 Oct 30;10(11):1773–1782. doi: 10.2217/fmb.15.106

Table 3.

Clinical trials that used TDF and/or FTC/TDF as PrEP for HIV prevention

Clinical Trial Population Design Relative reduction in HIV incidence in intention-to-treat analysis
Partners PrEP 4,747 heterosexual men and women with known HIV- infected partners (serodiscordant couples) 1:1:1 randomization to daily TDF, FTC/TDF or placebo TDF: 67% (95% CI: 44% to 81%; p < 0.0001)
FTC/TDF: 75% (95% CI: 5% to 87%; p < 0.0001)
TDF2 1,219 heterosexual men and women 1:1 randomization to daily oral
FTC/TDF or placebo
FTC/TDF: 63% (95 % CI: 22% to 83%; p = 0.01)
iPrEx 2,499 MSM and transgender women 1:1 randomization to daily oral
FTC/TDF or placebo
FTC/TDF: 44% (95% I: 15% to 63%; p = 0.005)
Fem-PrEP 2120 women 1:1 randomization to daily oral
FTC/TDF or placebo
FTC/TDF: 6% (p = 0.8). No statistically significant reduction in HIV incidence
VOICE 3,019 women (plus 2010 women receiving tenofovir or placebo gel) 1:1:1 randomization to daily oral
TDF, FTC/TDF or placebo
TDF: -49% (p = 0.07)
FTC/TDF: -4% (p > 0.2)
No statistically significant reduction in HIV incidence
Bagkok Tenofovir Study 2,413 injection drug users 1:1 randomization to daily oral TDF or placebo TDF: 48.9% (95% CI 9.6% to 72.2 %; p = 0.01)