Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 2;15(3):1048–1059. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M115.052993

Table I. Comparison of UWMS flow rate, rheology and dryness assessment for SS patients and healthy controls.

Sjögren's patients
Controls
Mean ± S.E. n Mean ± S.E. n
Age (years) 55.00 ± 3.16 25 55.71 ± 3.01 35
CODS (score) 4.04 ± 0.42a 24 0.27 ± 0.08 30
BI (score) B5 7.46 ± 1.01a 24 0.13 ± 0.06 32
B1 5.98 ± 0.63a 0.03 ± 0.03
UWMS Flow Rate (ml/min) 0.15 ± 0.03a 25 0.41 ± 0.04 35
RMS (μl) AHP 0.36 ± 0.05b 24 1.09 ± 0.16 35
BUC 2.08 ± 0.21c 3.05 ± 0.16
AT 2.27 ± 0.26c 3.28 ± 0.13
LL 1.20 ± 0.18c 2.18 ± 0.22 34
RMS MUC7 PAS (staining intensity) AHP 1504 ± 886b 23 292 ± 40 30
BUC 488 ± 137 23 271 ± 43 30
AT 721 ± 154 23 266 ± 34 30
LL 877 ± 200 14 669 ± 171 29
Spinnbarkeit (mm) 4.67 ± 0.78d 21 28.54 ± 5.66 30

Objective dryness assessment was achieved using the Clinical Oral Dryness Score (CODS). Bother Index (BI), a two-part questionnaire (B1 and B5), was used for subjective dryness assessment. Unstimulated whole mouth saliva (UWMS) flow rate was calculated gravimetrically. Residual mucosal saliva (RMS) was collected and measured from four oral mucosal surfaces: anterior hard palate (AHP), buccal (BUC), anterior tongue (AT), and lower labial (LL) and stained by PAS. Extensional rheological was quantified by measuring saliva spinnbarkeit. Statistical significance is shown as a p ≤ .0001, b p ≤ .05, c p ≤ .001, d p ≤ .01.