TABLE 2.
1997 | 19981 | 1999 | 20002 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 20043 | 2005 | 20064 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Update methodology | |||||||||||||||
AAPC 95% | X | ||||||||||||||
AAPC 100% | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||||
One floor | X | X | X | ||||||||||||
Urban/rural floor | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||
2 pct. pt. increase | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | ||
3pct.pt.increase | X | ||||||||||||||
Blend | X | X | |||||||||||||
Risk-adjustment method | |||||||||||||||
Demographic (%) | 100 | 100 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 70 | 50 | 25 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Demog/diagnosis (%) | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 30 | 50 | 75 | 90 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
Penetration/Payment | |||||||||||||||
Managed care pen. (%) | 13.1 | 13.5 | 12.0 | 10.6 | 9.6 | 9.5 | 9.7 | 10.9 | 11.8 | 13.5 | 14.3 | 18.0 | 18.7 | ||
MA payment mean ($) | 617 | 613 | 627 | 653 | 670 | 668 | 729 | 754 | 765 | 795 | 814 | 850 | 854 | ||
MA payment min | 483 | 487 | 502 | 572 | 596 | 593 | 631 | 650 | 660 | 683 | 699 | 726 | 729 | ||
MA payment max | 1,030 | 1,024 | 1,018 | 1,011 | 1,018 | 1,015 | 1,303 | 1,343 | 1,362 | 1,410 | 1,443 | 1,499 | 1,505 |
Data source: http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Health-Plans/MedicareAdvtgSpecRateStats/Ratebooks-and-Supporting-Data.html.
Notes: MA managed care penetration rate is calculated as the total number of Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in an HMO or PPO plan in January divided by the total number of Medicare beneficiaries. MA penetration data are calculated from Medicare enrollment files. Payment rate is the county aged payment rate in 2011 dollars.
BBA in effect.
BIPA in effect.
MMA in effect.
Bidding introduced.