Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 30;11(3):e0152537. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152537

Table 1. Contribution of the studied pine constitutive defensive traits and their inducibility to the defensive clustering of pine species.

Trait values (least square mean ± SE) for the two defensive clusters (syndromes) and coefficients for linear discriminant analyses (LDA scaling) are shown. Significant (P < 0.05) and marginal (P < 0.10) differences between clusters are typed in bold.

Defensive trait LDA scaling Cluster A (n = 9) Cluster B (n = 9) P
Constitutive stem resin 106.81 39.80 ± 6.82 17.50 ± 1.21 0.003
Constitutive needle resin -241.08 22.40 ± 2.25 17.30 ± 2.08 0.097
Constitutive stem phenolics 117.64 11.44 ± 0.56 11.95 ± 1.40 0.721
Constitutive needle phenolics -182.87 23.95 ± 4.45 22.97 ± 1.65 0.829
JA-induced stem resin 65.43 1.64 ± 2.35 1.82 ± 1.16 0.944
JA-induced needle resin 128.33 -2.74 ± 2.08 5.59 ± 1.81 0.007
JA-induced stem phenolics -66.05 -0.73 ± 1.10 0.42 ± 0.59 0.346
JA-induced needle phenolics 167.13 -5.15 ± 2.25 7.35 ± 1.75 <0.001
SA-induced stem resin 19.42 -4.47 ± 2.26 -0.45 ± 0.90 0.144
SA-induced needle resin 112.67 -4.22 ± 1.05 2.16 ± 2.23 0.024
SA-induced stem phenolics -96.92 0.61 ± 1.68 -2.70 ± 1.52 0.183
SA-induced needle phenolics NC1 -4.34 ± 1.70 3.15 ± 2.50 0.030

1NC = not calculated due to high collinearity with other traits