Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 30;11(3):e0152623. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152623

Table 4. Paired sample statistics of one-handed, two-handed and IS holding technique (task 4, 5 and 6, respectively) with the forceps (rms of 3-D marker trajectories) (n = 11).

Paired differences
95% confidence
Pairs Pairs Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Lower Upper t-test Significance (2-tailed)
One-handed–Two-handed Task 4 –task 5 0.0409636 0.0446906 0.0134747 0.0109401 0.0709872 3.040 0.012
One-handed—IS Task 4 –task 6 0.0800000 0.0493027 0.01468653 0.0468780 0.1131220 5.382 0.000
Two-handed—IS Task 5 –task 6 0.0390364 0.0276888 0.0083485 0.0204348 0.0576379 4.676 0.001