Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 11.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2016 Feb 3;530(7589):219–222. doi: 10.1038/nature16954

Extended Data Table 1.

Statistical analysis for Figs 1-4.

Figure Groups (Ns refer to animals in behavior and c-fos experiments and cells in electrophysiology experiments) Statistical Analysis
1d (RTPP) eGFP control (n = 8)
ChR2 + saline (n = 10)
ChR2 + NBQX (n = 8)
ChR2 + D1R antagonist (n = 8)
ChR2 + D2R antagonist (n = 8)
One-way ANOVA:
F(4, 37) = 29.61, p < 0.0001
Post-hoc Tukey's test:
ChR2 + saline vs. GFP control, p < 0.001
ChR2 + saline vs. ChR2 + NBQX, p < 0.001
ChR2 + saline vs. ChR2 + D1R antagonist, p = 0.98
ChR2 + saline vs. ChR2 + D2R antagonist, p = 0.58
2c (c-fos) Morphine + saline (n = 5)
Morphine + naloxone (n = 6)
Mann-Whitney U-test
Morphine + saline vs. Morphine + naloxone, p < 0.01
2d (Behavioral signs) eGFP control (n = 9)
ArchT silencing (n = 10)
Mann-Whitney U-test
Jump: GFP vs. Arch, p < 0.001
Rearing: GFP vs. Arch, p < 0.01
Tremor: GFP vs. Arch, p < 0.001
2e (CPA) eGFP control (n = 9)
ArchT silencing (n = 10)
Mann-Whitney U-test
1d CPA: GFP vs. Arch, p < 0.05
7d CPA: GFP vs. Arch, p < 0.05
2f (hM4Di silencing current) Baseline (n = 5)
CNO (n = 5)
Wilcoxon signed-rank test
Baseline vs. CNO, p < 0.05
2g (Spontaneous withdrawal) eGFP + CNO (n = 8)
hM4D + CNO (n = 8)
hM4D + saline (n = 8)
One-way ANOVA:
F(2, 21) = 7.4, p < 0.01
Post-hoc Tukey's test:
hM4D + CNO vs. GFP + CNO, p < 0.05
hM4D + CNO vs. hM4D + saline, p < 0.01
hM4D + saline vs. GFP + CNO, p = 0.55
2h (Locomotion) eGFP control (n = 9)
ArchT silencing (n = 9)
Wilcoxon signed-rank test
Saline: GFP vs. Arch, p = 0.57
Morphine: GFP vs. Arch, p = 0.5
3c (AN ratio) Saline D1 (n = 14)
Saline D2 (n = 13)
Morphine D1 (n = 14)
Morphine D2 (n = 16)
Two-way factorial ANOVA
Group (saline, morphine) × Cell (D1, D2)
Group: F(1,53) = 17.01, p < 0.001
Cell: F(1,53) = 9.18, p < 0.01
Group × Cell: F(1,53) = 12.58, p < 0.001
Post-hoc Tukey's test:
saline D1 vs morphine D1, p = 0.97
saline D2 vs morphine D2, p < 0.001
3e (Rectification index) Saline D1 (n = 8)
Saline D2 (n = 7)
Morphine D1 (n = 9)
Morphine D2 (n = 10)
Two-way factorial ANOVA
Group (saline, morphine) × Cell (D1, D2)
Group: F(1,30) = 6.65, p < 0.05
Cell: F(1,30) = 4.32, p < 0.05
Group × Cell: F(1,30) = 9.87, p < 0.01
Post-hoc Tukey's test:
saline D1 vs morphine D1, p = 0.97
saline D2 vs morphine D2, p < 0.01
4c (AN ratio) Morphine D1 (n = 14)
Morphine D2 (n = 16)
Morphine + 1Hz, D1 (n = 14)
Morphine + 1Hz, D2 (n = 17)
Two-way factorial ANOVA
Group (morphine, morphine + 1Hz) × Cell (D1, D2)
Group: F(1,57) = 21.59, p < 0.0001
Cell: F(1,57) = 11.57, p < 0.01
Group × Cell: F(1,57) = 13.86, p < 0.001
Post-hoc Tukey's test:
Morphine D1 vs morphine 1Hz D1, p = 0.97
Morphine D2 vs morphine 1 Hz D2, p< 0.001
4e (Rectification index) morphine D1 (n = 9)
morphine D2 (n = 10)
depotentiation D1 (n = 7)
depotentiation D2 (n = 10)
Two-way factorial ANOVA
Group (morphine, morphine 1Hz) × Cell (D1, D2)
Group: F(1,32) = 5.12, p < 0.05
Cell: F(1,32) = 8.23, p < 0.01
Group × Cell: F(1,32) = 4.3, p < 0.05
Post-hoc Tukey's test:
saline D1 vs morphine D1, p = 0.92
saline D2 vs morphine D2, p < 0.05
4g (Behavioral signs) eGFP control (n = 8)
ChR2 depotentiation (n = 8)
Mann-Whitney U-test
Jump: GFP vs. ChR2, p < 0.01
Rearing: GFP vs. ChR2, p < 0.01
Tremor: GFP vs. ChR2, p < 0.01
4h (CPA) eGFP control (n = 8)
ChR2 depotentiation (n = 8)
Mann-Whitney U-test
1d CPA: GFP vs. ChR2, p < 0.05
7d CPA: GFP vs. ChR2, p < 0.01