Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Sex Res. 2015 Sep 30;53(4-5):601–613. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2015.1061631

Figure 1.

Figure 1

A multi-group analysis was conducted based on partner type (new casual partner vs. previous relationship partner). The path between SDS endorsement and potential ambivalence was expected to differ based on partner type. All other paths were not expected to differ based on group membership and so corresponding paths were constrained to be equal across groups. For simplicity, error terms are not shown.