Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Sex Res. 2015 Sep 30;53(4-5):601–613. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2015.1061631

Table 1.

Descriptive Statistics and Correlations by Partner Type Condition

1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
1. SDS Endorsement -- .17* .11 .19** .03
2. Potential Ambivalence .08 -- .43*** −.20** −.33***
3. Felt Ambivalence .12 .49*** -- −.13 −.06
4. Abdication to Partner .23** −.27*** −.28*** -- .29***
5. Unprotected Sex Intentions −.001 −.30*** −.22** .45*** --

Mean (SD) by Group
New Casual Partner Group 1.87 (.60)a .90 (1.20)a 2.28 (1.60)a 1.76 (1.63)a 1.83 (1.64)a
Previous Relationship Partner Group 1.86 (.58)a .49 (1.22)b 2.09 (1.57)a 2.29 (1.69)b 2.59 (1.87)b

Note:

p = .09,

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001.

Values above the diagonal are correlations for the new casual partner group (n = 183), whereas values below the diagonal are correlations for the previous relationship partner group (n = 177). For means, differing subscripts within a column reflect significant group differences (p’s < .01) by outcome measure.