Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 20;474(5):1199–1208. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4598-x

Table 2.

Summary of quality assessment for studies included in systematic review based on Centre of Evidence Based Medicine case study appraisal tool (www.cebm.net/critical-appraisal)*

Appraisal question Study number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Did the study address a clearly focused question/issue?
Is the research method (study design) appropriate for answering the research question?
Are both the setting and the subjects representative with regard to the population to which the findings will be referred?
Is the researcher’s perspective clearly described and taken into account?
Are the methods for collecting data clearly described?
Are the methods for analyzing the data likely to be valid and reliable? Are quality control measures used?
Was the analysis repeated by more than one research to ensure reliability?
Are the results credible, and if so, are they relevant for practice?
Are the conclusions justified by the results?
Are the findings of the study transferable to other settings?

* Study corresponding to study number as follows: (1) Barrett et al. [3]; (2) Berkeley et al. [5]; (3) Chang et al. [7]; (4) El-Sayed [10]; (5) Erturk et al. [11]; (6) Haidar et al. [14]; (7) Lin et al. [22]; (8) Ning et al. [26]; (9) Powell et al. [28]; (10) Ruszkowski and Pucher [30]; (11) Ryan et al. [31]; (12) Salter and Dubos [32]; (13) Spence et al. [38]; (14) Subasi et al. [39]; (15) Tezeren et al. [40]; (16) Wu et al. [44]; (17) Zadeh et al. [45]; (18) Zionts et al. [46].