Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 20;474(5):1199–1208. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4598-x

Table 5.

Results summary of comparison between surgical prescription*

Parameter AOR
versus
AOR/P
AOR
versus
AOR/F
AOR
versus
AOR/F/P
AOR/P
versus
AOR/F
AOR/P
versus
AOR/F/P
AOR/F
versus
AOR/F/P
AVN 0.21 (0.07–0.72)
p = 0.004
0.21 (0.06–0.78)
p = 0.014
0.15 (0.045–0.48)
p < 0.001
0.95 (0.48–1.91)
p = 0.856
0.68 (0.46–1.00)
p = 0.052
0.71 (0.36–1.39)
p = 0.345
Radiological outcome 4.38 (1.04–18.55)
p = 0.029
1.76 (0.15–20.51)
p = 0.539
6.83 (1.63–28.63)
p = 0.001
0.40 (0.05–3.08)
p = 0.713
1.56 (1.02–2.38)
p = 0.044
3.88 (0.51–29.5)
p = 0.220
Clinical outcome 19.07 (1.15–316.02)
p = 0.001
117.00 (4.35–3139.68)
p = 0.003
19.33 (1.18–318.01)
p = 0.001
6.21 (0.85–45.64)
p = 0.101
1.02 (0.63–1.64)
p = 1.000
0.16 (0.02–1.19)
p =0.102
Further procedures 10.13 (3.47–29.59)
p < 0.001
3.02 (0.99–9.24)
p = 0.078
14.51 (4.14–50.86)
p < 0.001
0.30 (0.15–0.58)
p < 0.001
1.43 (0.60–3.45)
p = 0.415
4.80 (1.89–12.21)
p < 0.001

* Level of significance adjusted to α < 0.003; statistically significant result; odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals in parentheses; AOR = anterior open reduction; P = pelvic osteotomy; F = femoral osteotomy; AVN = avascular necrosis.