Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 4;474(5):1269–1279. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4663-5

Table 2.

Comparison of ROM and functional scores between the two groups

Variable Group p value
ADSF ORIF
Operation time (minutes) 95.3 ± 10.6 (80–120) 61.5 ± 7.2 (50–75) < 0.001
Followup ROM
 Forward flexion (degrees) 152.7 ± 13.3 (130–170) 137.7 ± 19.2 (100–170) 0.017
 Abduction (degrees) 146.0 ± 16.4 (120–170) 132.4 ± 20.5 (90–170) 0.048
 External rotation (degrees) 30.7 ± 14.9 (10–60) 33.5 ± 16.2 (10–60) 0.608
 Internal rotation L1 (L4 to T7) L2 (L5 to T7) 0.432
Followup score
 VAS 0.8 ± 0.9 (0–3) 0.9 ± 1.2 (0–4) 0.834
 ASES 91.8 ± 4.1 (85–100) 87.4 ± 5.8 (80–100) 0.021

Data expressed as mean ± SD and range; ADSF = arthroscopic double-row suture anchor fixation; ORIF = open reduction internal fixation.