Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 29;3(1):011002. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.3.1.011002

Table 1.

Summary of similarities between eye tracking studies in conventional radiography and in volumetric imaging, unique challenges of eye tracking studies regarding the volumetric imaging context and proposed actions to overcome these.

Issues Similarities conventional radiography and volumetric imaging Challenges unique to the volumetric imaging context Actions to overcome challenges in volumetric imaging
Stimulus material Issues of standardization Free scrolling adds factor to study Weighing of experimental rigor and ecological validity
Multitude of options to manipulate images Only one manipulation at a time
Event detection Event detection based on physiological properties of eye movements Smooth pursuit eye movements Velocity based event detection or use of raw data after elimination of saccades
Events cover multiple slices Customized software that maps proportions of events to slices
Parameter calculation Similar parameters can be used to study visual search Positioning of AOI in case introduces variability Calculation of parameters directly related to event
Meaning of parameters may change More research is needed, time will tell
Scrolling behavior is not covered by conventional parameters New parameters are being developed, further research is needed for their validation
Reporting abnormalities (JAF) ROC studies are suitable Orientation within case can be tricky Visible marking of reported lesions
Reporting interferes with eye tracking Tracking of reporting to separate perceptual and decision making processes