Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 7;22(13):3652–3662. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i13.3652

Table 4.

Comparison of tumor dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging pharmacokinetic parameters from 28 scanned patients using two models [Median (IQR)]

ktrans (min-1) PS (mL/mLmin-1) Fp (mL/mLmin-1) kep (min-1) ve vp HPI
Dual-Input Extended Tofts model 0.29 ± 0.38 - - 1.35 ± 1.42 0.51 ± 1.16 0.12 ± 0.21 0.66 ± 0.24
Dual-Input Exchange model - 0.19 ± 0.36 1.07 ± 1.73 0.95 ± 1.60 1.22 ± 1.19 0.14 ± 0.17 0.63 ± 0.29
Z/t value NA NA NA -0.638 -2.869 -0.568 0.4991
P value NA NA NA 0.524 0.004 0.569 0.6221
1

Paired t-test. NA: Not available; HPI: Hepatic perfusion index.