eTable 2. Blood pressure control rates and average ambulatory blood pressure values for the study population and patients with and without resistant hypertension, stratified by intervention status.
| ABP <130/80 mmhg | Baseline, n (%) | 5 months follow-up, n (%) | Difference | p*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall (N=103) | 0 (0.0) | 20 (19.4) | + 19.4 | <0.001 |
| Intervention (n=63) | 0 (0.0) | 12 (19.0) | + 19.0 | 0.001 |
| Control (n=40) | 0 (0.0) | 8 (20.0) | + 20.0 | 0.008 |
| p*2 | 0.905 | |||
| With resistant hypertension (N=52) | 0 (0.0) | 10 (19.2) | + 19.2 | 0.002 |
| Intervention (n=28) | 0 (0.0) | 6 (21.4) | + 21.4 | 0.031 |
| Control (n=24) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (16.7) | + 16.7 | 0.125 |
| p*2 | 0.736 | |||
| Without resistant hypertension (N=51) | 0 (0.0) | 10 (19.6) | + 19.6 | 0.002 |
| Intervention (n=35) | 0 (0.0) | 6 (17.1) | + 17.1 | 0.031 |
| Control (n=16) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (25.0) | + 25.0 | 0.046 |
| p*2 | 0.705 | |||
ABP, ambulatory blood pressure
*1Comparison of baseline and follow-up data using McNemar tests for categorical variables and paired t-tests for continuous variables
*2Comparison of intervention and control data using chi-square tests for categorical variables and t-tests in independent samples for continuous variables