Table 2.
Simulation 1 | Simulation 2 | Simulation 3 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Our Method | Our Method | RnaSeqSampleSize | Our Method | ||||||||
m | Sample | Anticipated | Observed | Sample | Anticipated | Observed | Sample | Estimated | Sample | Anticipated | Observed |
size | power | power | size | power | power | size | power | size | power | power | |
50 | 35 | 0.802 | 0.858 | 13 | 0.810 | 0.876 | 9 | 0.780 | 22 | 0.800 | 0.801 |
100 | 34 | 0.814 | 0.846 | 13 | 0.814 | 0.876 | 9 | 0.724 | 22 | 0.803 | 0.801 |
200 | 34 | 0.815 | 0.846 | 13 | 0.823 | 0.876 | 9 | 0.765 | 22 | 0.804 | 0.801 |
500 | 33 | 0.817 | 0.833 | 13 | 0.827 | 0.876 | 9 | 0.769 | 22 | 0.805 | 0.801 |
1000 | 32 | 0.800 | 0.804 | 13 | 0.826 | 0.876 | 9 | 0.764 | 22 | 0.805 | 0.801 |
We also present the comparison between our method and RnaSeqSampleSize R package for simulation 2, where the right two columns are sample size and power calculated by the RnaSeqSampleSize R package