Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 31;17:169. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1270-z

Table 3.

Evaluation criteria for the assessment of treatments (modified from Innes et al. [21])

Success • satisfactory restoration/crown, no intervention required
• no clinical signs or symptoms of pulp pathology
• tooth exfoliated
Minor Failures • secondary caries, or new lesions detected clinically
• crown presents perforation
• restoration fracture or wear - intervention required
• loss of restoration - tooth that can be re-restored
• crown loss - tooth able to be re-treated
• reversible pulpitis, which could be treated without the need for extraction or pulpotomy
Major Failures • irreversible pulpitis or dental fistula/abscess, requiring pulpotomy or extraction
• loss of restoration/crown - tooth does not capable of being re-restored