Table 2.
Studies Assessing Clinical Presentations: studies with control group
| Source | Clinical setting, Years | No. of Patients | Age, Mean (Range) | Gender (M, F) | Control group | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plouin et al., 1981 | Hypertension service, saint-Joseph hospital, Paris, France, from 1977 | 2585 hypertensive patients (11 of them were found to have pheochromocytoma) | 33–60 | 1443,1142 | All of the 2585 patients are considered control group as the proportion of pheochromocytoma is 0.4 % | [13] |
| Peter P. Stein et al. 1991 | Yale university school of medicine, USA. | 30 episodes (29 patients), 28 controls | 37 (18–65) | 13,16 | Yesa | [16] |
| 43 (20–65) | 16,12 | |||||
| Henry R. Black et al. 1984 | 11 new England hospitals, USA, 1962–1980 | 53 patients (60 first. 5 excluded because of finding based on predisposition genetic factor. 1 excluded because of being asymptomatic and tumor found at autopsy) 25 controls | 41 (13–85) | 27, 26 | Yesb | [17] |
| 39.3 (19–85) | 14,11 | |||||
| P.F. Plouin et al., 1988 | Hypertension departments of 2 hospitals, Paris, France, 1976–1985 | 39 patients | --- | Yes (21 patients with essential hypertension) | [20] | |
| 21 controls | ||||||
| Václavík J et al. 2007 | Sternberk Hospital, Sternberk, Czech Republic. | 14 patients | 58 (37–74) | 6,8 | Yesc | [23] |
| 214 controls | 57 (16–84) | 86,128 | ||||
| Run Yu et al. 2007 | An academic hospital, Los Angeles, USA 1997–2007 | 40 patients | 54(10–78) | 16,24 | Yes (patients with over-diagnosed pheochromocytoma) | [41] |
| 9 controls | 57 (36–82) | 2,7 | ||||
| Yu R et al. 2010 | Division of Endocrinology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California. 2000–2008 | 13 patients | 53 (23–86) | 6,7 | Yes (24 patients with highly elevated biochemical tests but pheochromocytoma was ruled out) | [47] |
| 24 controls | 59 (28–82) | 10,14 |
a28 (a pheochromocytoma was considered but excluded if any 1 of several conditions were met: 1) repeatedly normal urine collections for catecholamine metabolites (VMA or MN) and urine free catecholamines (UFC) and no diagnosis of pheochromocytoma after 2 years of follow up; 2) negative imaging studies (CT, MRI or MIBG) and no diagnosis of pheochromocytoma after 2 years of follow up; 3) resolution of the clinical symptoms and/or alternate diagnosis, explaining the symptoms, established.)
bPatients highly suspected to have pheochromocytoma in whom the diagnosis was ruled out by negative arteriograms and no evidence of disease after at least 18 months follow-up
c213 patients screened for resistant or markedly accelerated hypertension, paroxysmal hypertension, and ‘flushes’ and, in a small proportion, for adrenal incidentaloma or genetic predisposition to pheochromocytoma. in who diagnose was not confirmed by long-term follow-up or use of imaging techniques