Table 10.
Sample | # merged | % merged | # reads after C&M | # mapped reads | Duplicates |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
name | reads | reads | prior to mapping | prior to DeDup | removed with DeDup |
3077 | 5,437,812 | 94.78 % | 5,737,174 | 1,023,502 | 410,234 |
Jorgen625 | 12,956,100 | 80.5 % | 16,093,580 | 2,659,178 | 94,005 |
Refshale16 | 32,041,091 | 73.61 % | 43,528,407 | 12,782,665 | 3,872,555 |
SK2 | 51,364,343 | 99.27 % | 51,741,310 | 48,211,553 | 47,353,377 |
SK8 | 7,683,942 | 72.5 % | 10,597,941 | 1,227,067 | 185,913 |
The report shows results for five leprosy samples processed with EAGER. The number of merged reads, the percentage of merged reads as well as the number of duplicates removed can be seen for the respective samples. Note that this has been narrowed down to fit the page layout. A full report features more statistical values describing a sample, depending on which methods have been chosen to be executed in the pipeline (see Additional file 1)