Table 7.
Sampling | 0.005 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.20 | 0.30 | 0.40 |
Expected mean coverage | 0.10 | 0.19 | 0.39 | 0.97 | 1.94 | 3.88 | 5.82 | 7.76 |
Achieved mean coverage | 0.09 | 0.19 | 0.38 | 0.94 | 1.88 | 3.75 | 5.63 | 7.51 |
Cov % of genome ≥1 read | 8.70 % | 16.47 % | 29.71 % | 56.28 % | 76.85 % | 88.41 % | 90.69 % | 91.28 % |
Cov % of genome by ANGSD | 8.64 % | 16.37 % | 29.55 % | 56.06 % | 76.68 % | 88.35 % | 90.67 % | 91.27 % |
% of correctly called bases | 99.72 % | 99.73 % | 99.74 % | 99.77 % | 99.82 % | 99.89 % | 99.92 % | 99.93 % |
The first row refers to the percentage of reads that were randomly sampled from the original data set (LBK/Stuttgart) from Lazaridis et al. [19] (coverage ≈19×) using SAMtools. The expected mean coverage was derived by multiplication of the original coverage with the sampling value. The achieved mean coverage was calculated using QualiMap after mapping. Cov % of genome ≥1 read is the percentage of the genome that was covered by at least one read. This was also calculated using QualiMap. Cov % of genome by ANGSD is the percentage of the genome that was reconstructed from the genotypes as derived with ANGSD. % of correctly called bases is the percentage of bases that ANGSD called correctly not regarding the base “N”