Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 24;25(3):618–626. doi: 10.1002/pro.2855

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Aminoacylation and editing activities of chimera protein in comparison with various wild‐type PheRSs: (A) Charging of E. coli tRNAPhe transcript (0.8 μM) with Phe by chimera (0.4 µM) or HsmtPheRS (0.4 µM). Reactions were performed at 37°C in the presence of 5 mM ATP and 4 μM [3H]Phe; (B) Editing activities of chimera (1 µM) and EcPheRS (20 nM) toward exogenous Tyr‐tRNAPhe (1.2 μM); (C) Reaminoacylation of m‐Tyr‐tRNAPhe with Phe by chimera or HsmtPheRS. The E. coli tRNAPhe transcript was preaminoacylated with m‐Tyr and purified, then incubated (at 1.2 µM concentration) in the presence of ATP, [3H]Phe, and chimera (0.4 μM) or HsmtPheRS (0.4 µM).