. 2013 Oct 9;115(2):125–129. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2013.95

Table 1. Estimates of mating patterns using MTLR (Ritland 2002).

	Density (trees per ha)	Progeny array size	t_m	t_m−t_s	r_p
Tirimbina old growth forest	6.4	19.75 (0.63)	1.00 (0.05)^a	0.00 (0.04)^a	0.24 (0.05)^a
Tirimbina secondary forest	40.6	19.08 (1.89)	1.00 (0.06)^a	0.00 (0.05)^a	0.27 (0.07)^a
Tirimbina pasture trees		20.00 (0.00)	1.00 (0.00)^a	0.00 (0.04)^a	0.01 (0.12)^b
Ladrillera primary forest	2.5	19.85 (0.37)	1.00 (0.02)^a	0.04 (0.02)^a	0.22 (0.04)^a
Ladrillera secondary forest	241.5	19.05 (2.63)	0.93 (0.05)^a	0.04 (0.02)^a	0.21 (0.03)^a

t_m, multilocus outcrossing rate; t_m−t_s, biparental inbreeding; r_p, multilocus correlated paternity; standard deviation in parentheses; 95% confidence interval homogeneous subgroups of mating patterns are indicated by ‘a' and ‘b'.