Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 24;114(2):207–219. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2014.87

Table 2. Analysis of diversity and functionality within each lineage of U1 snDNA.

  n s H Hd π (s.d.) Θw G+C (s.d.)
E. plorans L1 11 168 1 0.000 0.00000 (0.00000) 0.00000 54.8 (0.4)
E. plorans L2 16 166 10 0.933 0.01536 (0.00223) 0.02072 53.9 (0.5)
E. plorans L3 5 134 1 0.000 0.00000 (0.00000) 0.00000 55.2 (0.0)
E. plorans L4 21 133 13 0.938 0.03946 (0.01018) 0.07721 55.9 (0.5)
E. plorans L5 7 162 5 0.857 0.01258 (0.00387) 0.01797 51.9 (0.6)
L. migratoria L1 30 163 16 0.899 0.01943 (0.00259) 0.02942 55.7 (0.6)
L. migratoria L2 11 163 4 0.491 0.00781 (0.00377) 0.01466 52.1 (0.3)
L. migratoria L3 3 163 2 0.667 0.02045 (0.00964) 0.02045 56.4 (0.0)
L. migratoria L4 3 163 3 1.000 0.02045 (0.00578) 0.02045 55.4 (0.9)
L. migratoria L5 15 132 15 1.000 0.15366 (0.01373) 0.18349 54.0 (2.2)

Analysis of diversity and functionality within each lineage of U1 snDNA found in the genome of E. plorans and L. migratoria, showing the number of sequences (n), number of sites (s), number of haplotypes (H), haplotype diversity (Hd), nucleotide diversity (π), number of segregating sites per site by means of Watterson's estimator (Θw) and mean percentage of G+C.

Note that all five sequences for lineage 3 showed exactly the same sequence; thus, π and Θw were equal to zero. Lineage 1, however, showed five haplotypes differing for some insertions from the consensus sequence but not for substitutions, such that the former parameters were also equal to zero because they were calculated including only those nucleotide positions present in all DNA sequences.