Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 5;113(3):195–204. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2014.14

Table 1. Summary of genetic markers screened and mapped in the Senecio aethnensis × S. chrysanthemifolius F2 genetic mapping family.

Marker type No. of screened No. of developed No. of genotyped No. of mapped Unlinked Problematic
Codominant markers
 EST indel 45 15 10 8   EC77, EC1687
 EST SSR 216 48 33 31 ES91 ES19
 Indel 7 4 3 3    
 SSR 72 9 8 8    
 Total 340 76 54 50 1 3
             
Dominant markers
 E1M3, CAAC/ACAG 19 15 179, 219  
 E1M5, CAAC/ACTA 15 10 168, 213 88, 160, 204
 E1M7, CAAC/ACTG 13 12 275  
 E4M7, CACT/ACTG 9 8 113  
 E5M3, CACC/ACAG 8 7 302  
 E5M6, CACC/ACTC 9 9    
 E8M5, CAGG/ACTA 11 9 114 196
 E8M7, CAGG/ACTG 7 7    
 Total 91 77 8 6

Abbreviations: EST, expressed sequence tag; SSR, simple sequence repeat.

Marker types are divided into codominant or dominant markers. Codominant markers are further divided into markers derived from ESTs, SSRs or insertion-deletions (indel). Dominant markers are amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs). Each AFLP primer combination is shown as the primer names used in this study followed by the three selective bases for the EcoRI and MseI primers, respectively (Supplementary Methods). No. of screened is number of codominant marker primer pairs tested. No. of developed is number of codominant markers that could be scored in Senecio. No. of genotyped is number of markers showing polymorphism in the F2AC mapping family. No. of mapped is number of markers that were included in the final genetic map. Unlinked names markers that were unlinked at a >4 logarithm of odds score or>20 cM linkage threshold limits for mapping. Problematic refers to markers that caused problems with linkage group marker order or were present in multiple linkage groups. Dominant marker names are approximate fragment base-pair lengths used to label AFLP loci.