Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 27;29(10):1308–1314. doi: 10.1038/eye.2015.17

Table 2. Comparison of the clinical demographics between progressors and non-progressors in temporally tilted disc.

Characteristics Progressors (n=20) mean±SD Non-progressors (n=27) mean±SD P-valuea
Age (years) 53±8.9 (31–88) 52±11.8 (32–69) 0.73
Gender male/female 12/8 18/9 0.50
Follow-up period (months) 101.1±28.9 118.7±35.3 0.07
Spherical equivalent (D) −4.8±1.5 (−7 to −3) −4.9±1.2 (−7 to −0.2) 0.64
Number of topical medications 1.3±0.5 (1–2) 1.5±0.5 (1–3) 0.08
Baseline IOP (mm Hg) 16.0±2.8 (13–20) 16.8±2.5 (10–21) 0.35
Mean IOP (mm Hg) 15.9±1.9 (13.4–19.0) 15.0±1.8 (12.0–18.2) 0.10
Peak IOP (mm Hg) 19.0±2.3 (16–21) 18.0±2.6 (14–21) 0.24
Baseline mean RNFL thickness (μm) 81.4±13.8 (58.4–106.1) 75.3±15.2 (48.68–104.58) 0.16
Baseline mean CCT (μm) 532.1±35.5 (482–588) 527.4±29.3 (484–614) 0.64
Number of visual field tests 10.5±3.4 (8–16) 11.1±2.4 (5–20) 0.52
Baseline MD (dB) −6.0±5.5 (−11.4 to −1.1) −4.6±4.2 (−23.74 to –0.1) 0.34
Baseline PSD (dB) 8.4±5.6 (2.81–16.6) 7.4±4.2 (1.63–15.8) 0.47
Baseline VFI (%) 84.4±15.5 (56–99) 87.1±13.9 (31–99) 0.54

Abbreviations: CCT, central corneal thickness; IOP, intraocular pressure; MD, mean deviation; PSD, pattern SD; RNFL, retinal nerve fiber layer; VFI, visual field index.

a

Mann–Whitney U-test.