Table 3.
Summary of the effects of wheel running on fear learning.
Behavioral test | Exercise improves fear conditioning? |
Wheel access (d) |
Distance ran (km/d) |
Sex | Strain/species | Housed | Sed Ctrl | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fear potentiated startle | Y | 14a | 4.5 | M | C57BL/6J | G | L | (Falls et al., 2010) |
Passive avoidance | Y | 28a | 1b | M | C57BL/6J | G | L | (Samorajski et al., 1985) |
– | 28a | 2–3c | M | BALB/c | G | L | (Liu et al., 2009) | |
Fear conditioned freezing | Yd,f and –e | 19a | 2 | M | Long Evans | G | A | (Hopkins and Bucci, 2010b) |
Yd,g | 21 | 7 | M | Long Evans | S | A | (Van Hoomissen et al., 2004) | |
Yd,h | 22 | 7 | M | Long Evans | S | A | (Van Hoomissen et al., 2011) | |
Yd,i | 26 | 6–7 | M | C57Bl6/N | S | A/L | (Dubreucq et al., 2010b) | |
– d | 28 | 10 | M | C57BL/6NCrl | S | L | (Cacciaglia et al., 2011) | |
Yd and –e | 30 | 2–5 | M | Long Evans | S | A | (Baruch et al., 2004) | |
Yd | 42 | 4 | M | Fisher 344 | S | A | (Greenwood et al., 2009) | |
– e,j | 38–41 | 5 | M | CB1 WT mice | S | L | (Dubreucq et al., 2010a) | |
– d,e,k | 46 | 6–7 | M | Long Evans | S | nd | (Wojtowicz et al., 2008) | |
Yd,l | 54 | 6 | M, F | C57BL6/J | S | A | (Clark et al., 2008) | |
– d | 56 | 6 | M | Sprague | S | L | (Burghardt et al., 2004) | |
Yd,m | 56 | 8 | M | Sprague | S | L | (Burghardt et al., 2006) | |
– d,e | 60a | Nd | F | C57BL6/J | G | L | (Pietropaolo et al., 2006) |
Abbreviations:–, did not alter fear conditioning; A, absent wheel controls; CB1, cannabinoid type I receptor; F, female; G, group housing; L, locked wheel controls; M, male; N, impaired fear conditioning; nd, no data; S, single housing; Sed Ctrl, sedentary controls; WT, wild type; Y, improved fear conditioning. Footnotes:
wheel was shared;
km/hour;
km/12 hour;
conditioning to context;
conditioning to cue;
effect reversed when testing occurred in PM or end of light portion of the light:dark cycle;
effect abolished by non-selective β-adrenergic receptor blocker propranolol;
effect was reversed by olfactory bulbectomy;
effect present only when compared to no wheel controls, not locked wheel controls;
improved deficits of CB1 receptor knockout mice;
trended towards improving fear conditioning, wherein time spent freezing was positively correlated with the number of cells expressing the young neuron marker PSA-NCAM in the dentate gyrus;
effect was not dependent on hippocampal irradiation;
effect present only after high, but not low running. Notes: Wheel access is reported at behavioral testing. Distance ran is reported as the mean at behavioral testing and was divided by the number of subjects per cage when the wheel was shared.