Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 20;30(23):3396–3398. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu553

Table 1.

Benchmark results comparing HPG Aligner to BWA MEM and Bowtie 2

RL MR (%) HPG Aligner
BWA MEM
Bowtie 2
CM Time CM Time CM Time
100 0.1 98.77 20.57 96.99 29.34 94.67 29.40
1 98.22 19.66 96.65 33.34 92.98 29.15
2 97.45 17.46 96.11 37.62 90.52 29.04
150 0.1 99.54 22.90 98.09 43.35 96.71 47.61
1 99.29 22.09 97.96 49.12 95.93 46.50
2 98.96 18.13 97.72 54.03 94.73 46.36
400 0.1 99.93 31.35 99.12 124.16 98.82 209.26
1 99.78 30.49 99.06 142.81 98.71 221.92
2 99.58 26.30 98.95 157.65 98.56 200.11
800 0.1 99.95 35.57 99.42 279.54 99.29 4604.90
1 99.74 35.00 99.38 312.55 99.24 2750.26
2 99.47 34.70 99.28 340.46 99.18 2894.38

Notes: Percentages of correct mapping (CM) and runtimes in min (Time) are displayed for different read length in base pairs (RL) and percentages of mutation rate [MR(%)]. For RLs, >800 bp Bowtie2 was unable to finish in 3 days.