Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 20;6(8):e107. doi: 10.1038/ctg.2015.21

Table 1. Reasons for exclusion of potentially eligible papers that were considered for the dietary intervention in IBS systematic review.

Reference Randomized Design Dietary intervention Control IBS symptoms assessed Dichotomous data extractable ≥7 Days therapy
King et al.13 Yes Crossover Exclusion diet Yes Yes No Yes
Ong et al.14 Yes Crossover Low FODMAPs diet Yes Yes No No
Bentley et al.15 Yes Crossover Exclusion diet after sensitivity testing Yes Yes No Unclear
Carroccio et al.16 Yes Crossover Empirical exclusion diet followed by sensitivity testing Unclear Yes No Yes
Shepherd et al.17 Yes Crossover Low FODMAPs Yes Yes No Yes
Vazquez Roque et al.18 Yes Parallel Gluten-free diet Yes No No Yes
Halmos et al.19 Yes Crossover Low FODMAPs Yes Yes No Yes
Biesiekierski et al.20 Yes Crossover Rechallenge of gluten after low FODMAPs diet Yes Yes No No
Berg et al.21 Yes Parallel Fructose-reducing diet “IBS diet”—unclear if this is another active therapy Yes No Yes
Jones et al.22 Yes Crossover Food rechallenge in food elimination responders Yes Yes No No
Carroccio et al.23 No No Gluten challenge in wheat-sensitive patients No No No Yes
Lunardi et al.24 Yes Crossover Oral chromoglycate in food-intolerant IBS patients—not an eligible intervention Yes Yes No Yes
Stefanini et al.25 Yes Parallel Empirical food elimination diet Sodium chromoglygate—not an eligible control Yes Yes Yes
Piccinini et al.26 a Yes Parallel Empirical food elimination diet Sodium chromoglygate—not an eligible control Yes Yes Yes

FODMAPs, Fermentable Oligo-Di-Monosaccharides and Polyols; IBS, irritable bowel syndrome.

a

Possible duplicate paper as design similar, but intervention was for 3 weeks rather than 4 weeks.