Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 31;11(3):e0152717. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152717

Table 2. Descriptive data of the included studies.

Measure Authors (Year) Setting* Study sample* Country
EPSCALE Silverman et al. (2011) summative OSCE with UMS during final MB examinations at University of Cambridge n = 124** UK
EPSCALE Edgcumbe et al. (2012) summative OSCE with UMS during final MB examinations at University of Cambridge n = 124** UK
MCS-OSCE Fischbeck et al. (2011)* formative and summative OSCE with UMS attending a Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology course at Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz sample 1: n = 182, 61% f, mage = 22 ys; sample 2: n = 181, 66% f, mage = 22 ys Germany
CCAT Harasym et al. (2008) summative OSCE with UMS during clinical clerkship at University of Calgary n = 190 Canada
AG-OSCE-R Hodges & McIlroy (2003) formative OSCE with UMS during clinical clerkship in 3rd or 4th study year at University of Toronto n = 57 Canada
AG-OSCE-R Scheffer et al. (2008) formative OSCE with UMS in 2nd or 3rd study year at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin n = 113, 65% f, mage = 23 ys (SDage = 4) Germany
AG-OSCE-R Mortsiefer et al. (2014) summative OSCE with UMS in 4th study year at Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf n = 453 Germany
LCSAS Humphris & Kaney (2001)* summative OSCE with UMS in 1st or 2nd study year at University of Liverpool sample 1: n = 600; sample 2: n = 60; sample 3: n = 80 UK
LUCAS Huntley et al. (2012)* formative and summative OSCE with UMS in 1st study year at University of Liverpool sample 1: n = 731, 53.7% f, mage = 19 ys (SDage = 1.61); sample 2: n = 40 UK
LIDM-RS Thistlethwaite (2002) summative OSCE with UMS in 3rd study year at University of Leeds n = 194 UK
CG Lang et al. (2004)* formative OSCE with UMS of two cohorts at East Tennessee State University and Tulane University sample 1: n = 50; sample 2: n = 50 USA
CG Van Nuland et al. (2012) summative OSCE with UMS in their final undergraduate year at Catholic University of Leuven n = 63 Belgium

*some studies were conducted in more than one setting and/or used more than one sample,

**Silverman et al. (2011) and Edgcumbe et al. (2012) used the same study sample, UMS = undergraduate medical students, MB = Medicinae Baccalaureus,

f = female, ys = years, m = mean, SD = standard deviation. Full titles of the rating scales: Explanation and Planning Scale (EPSCALE), Mayence Communication Skills OSCE (MCS-OSCE), Calgary-Cambridge Assessment Tool (CCAT), Analytic Global OSCE Rating (AG-OSCE-R), Liverpool Communication Skills Assessment Scale (LCSAS), Liverpool Undergraduate Communication Assessment Scale (LUCAS), Leeds Informed Decision Making Rating Scale (LIDM-RS), Common Ground (CG).