Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 30;352:i1541. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1541

Table 2.

Hazard ratios for association between pioglitazone and risk of bladder cancer

Exposure* No of events Person years Incidence rate (95% CI)† Age and sex adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) Fully adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI)‡
Primary analysis:
 No thiazolidinedione¶ 497 558 924 88.9 (81.3 to 97.1) 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference)
 Pioglitazone 54 44 618 121.0 (90.9 to 157.9) 1.68 (1.26 to 2.24) 1.63 (1.22 to 2.19)
Cumulative duration:
 ≤1 year 11 12 031 91.4 (45.6 to 163.6) 1.35 (0.74 to 2.46) 1.33 (0.73 to 2.40)
 1-2 years 14 11 583 120.9 (66.1 to 202.8) 1.70 (1.00 to 2.91) 1.66 (0.97 to 2.84)
 >2 years 29 21 004 138.1 (92.5 to 198.3) 1.84 (1.25 to 2.71) 1.78 (1.21 to 2.64)
P trend <0.01 <0.01
Cumulative dose:
 ≤10 500 mg 18 15 646 115.0 (68.2 to 181.8) 1.66 (1.04 to 2.67) 1.63 (1.02 to 2.60)
 10 500-28 000 mg 18 15 356 117.2 (69.5 to 185.3) 1.62 (1.01 to 2.61) 1.58 (0.98 to 2.55)
 >28 000 mg 18 13 616 132.2 (78.3 to 208.9) 1.76 (1.08 to 2.87) 1.70 (1.04 to 2.78)
P trend <0.01 <0.01

*Users of rosiglitazone and users of combination of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone are not displayed in the table, but were considered in the regression model for proper estimation of treatment effects.

†Per 100 000 person years.

‡Adjusted for age, year of cohort entry, sex, alcohol related disorders, smoking status, obesity, haemoglobin A1c, previous cancer, bladder conditions, Charlson comorbidity score, duration of treated diabetes, and urine protein testing.

¶No use of pioglitazone or rosiglitazone.