Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 14;5:e14120. doi: 10.7554/eLife.14120

Table 1.

Results of omnibus statistical tests of experiments for the general characterization of α2CA1KO, α2CA3KO and α2DGKO mice.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14120.009

1. Immunohistochemistry
One-Way ANOVA; Factor: Genotype
α2 Subunit α1 Subunit α5 Subunit
CA1 F(3,10)=9.44 P=0.003 F(3,9)=0.08 p=0.97 F(3,9)=0.10 p=0.96
CA3 F(3,10)=5.05 P=0.02 F(3,9)=0.01 p=0.99 F(3,9)=0.13 p=0.94
DG F(3,10)=9.08 P=0.003 F(3,9)=0.00 p=1.00 F(3,9)=0.06 p=0.98
Cortex F(3,10)=1.90 p=0.19 F(3,9)=0.01 p=0.83 F(3,9)=0.01 p=0.99
Amygdala F(3,10)=1.28 p=0.34 F(3,9)=0.21 p=0.89 F(3,9)=0.36 p=0.78
2. Quantitative PCR
One-Way ANOVA; Factor: Genotype
α2 Subunit α3 Subunit α4 Subunit
CA1 F(3,16)=10.66 p<0.001 F(3,16)=0.10 p=0.96 F(3,16)=2.48 p=0.1
CA3 F(3,16)=10.53 p<0.001 F(3,16)=0.67 p=0.58 F(3,16)=4.74 p=0.02
DG F(3,16)=7.32 p=0.003 F(3,12)=1.96 p=0.17 F(3,12)=2.90 p=0.08
Cortex F(3,16)=15.69 p<0.001
Amygdala F(3,16)=3.01 p=0.06
3. Slice Electrophysiology
Two-Way Mixed Factorial ANOVA; Factors: Genotype (between-subjects), Drug (within-subjects)
CA1 Amplitude Frequency Decay Time
Genotype F(1,38)=1.83 p=0.18 F(1,38)=2.80 p=0.10 F(1,38)=1.94 p=0.17
Drug F(1,38)=1.49 p=0.23 F(1,38)=9.38 p=0.004 F(1,38)=107.96 p<0.001
Genotype x Drug Interaction F(1,38)=2.91 p=0.09 F(1,38)=3.11 p=0.08 F(1,38)=0.82 p=0.37
CA3 Amplitude Frequency Decay Time
Genotype F(1,21)=2.36 p=0.14 F(1,21)=1.85 p=0.19 F(1,21)=0.95 p=0.34
Drug F(1,21)=0.66 p=0.42 F(1,21)=0.09 p=0.77 F(1,21)=30.54 p<0.001
Genotype x Drug Interaction F(1,21)=0.21 p=0.65 F(1,21)=1.90 p=0.18 F(1,21)=0.25 p=0.62
DG Amplitude Frequency Decay Time
Genotype F(1,21)=1.50 p=0.23 F(1,21)=1.58 p=0.22 F(1,21)=0.01 p=0.91
Drug F(1,21)=2.58 p=0.12 F(1,21)=1.58 p=0.22 F(1,21)=47.42 p<0.001
Genotype x Drug Interaction F(1,21)=0.54 p=0.47 F(1,21)=1.33 p=0.26 F(1,21)=0.30 p=0.59
4. Tests of Hippocampal Function
Delay – Trace Fear Conditioning
Two-Way Factorial ANOVA; Factors: Genotype (between-subjects), Condition (between-subjects)
% Freezing
Genotype F(3,49)=0.38 p=0.77
Condition F(1,49)=41.57 p<0.001
Genotype x Cond. Interaction F(3,49)=0.71 p=0.55
Contextual Fear Conditioning
One-Way ANOVA; Factor: Genotype (between-subjects)
% Freezing
Genotype F(3,35)=5.47 p=0.003
Morris Water Maze
Two-Way Factorial ANOVA; Factors: Genotype (between-subjects), Day (within-subjects)
Time to platform
Genotype F(3,80)=5.17 p=0.01
Day F(5,80)=244.12 p<0.001
Genotype x Day Interaction F(5,80)=1.36 p=0.19