Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 16;25(11):4284–4298. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu325

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Axial slices are shown in radiological convention, that is the right hemisphere on the left of each slice, beginning with the most ventral slice. (A) Univariate whole-brain analysis of Study 1. The significant main effect of competing speech (MFDIOTIC/NON-PREDICTABLE + MFDIOTIC/PREDICATBLE) contrasted with noncompeting (MALONE/NON-PREDICTABLE + MALONE/PREDICTABLE) speech is projected as a red/yellow overlay, with a voxel-level threshold Z > 2.3, cluster-level threshold, P < 0.05. (1) Superior temporal gyri (STG); (2) anterior insula and frontal operculum (aI/FOp); (3) lateral prefrontal and inferior parietal cortical network (MFG/SMG); (4) precuneus; (5) dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and adjacent superior frontal gyrus (dACC/SFG). (B–D) Results from the 20-component independent-component analysis (ICA). (B). Component 2 demonstrated regions with significant activity during all listening conditions (including Tones) > Silence (P < 0.00001). (1) Bilateral STG. (C). Component 3 demonstrated areas of significant activity for all speech listening conditions > Silence (P < 0.00001). (1) Bilateral STG, (5) dACC/SFG, (6) Bilateral inferior frontal sulci (IFS), (7) bilateral intraparietal sulcus (IPS), (8) lateral cerebellar hemispheres. (D). Component 4 demonstrated a main effect of diotic speech (MFDIOTIC/NON-PREDICTABLE + MFDIOTIC/PREDICATBLE) > single speech (MALONE/NON-PREDICATBLE + MALONE/PREDICTABLE) (P < 0.00007). (1) Bilateral STG, (2) right aI/FOp, (3) MFG/SMG, (4) precuneus, (5) dACC/SFG.