Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 31;5:397. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2019-6

Table 2.

The influence of stabilization treatments on pH and fresh weight (FW) shoot yield of lettuce grown on PK and BA soils

Stabilization treatments PKa soil BAa soil
Soil pH Shoot yield (FW) Soil pH Shoot yield (FW)
FMB 7.04 (0.09)eb 144 (13.0)a 8.39 (0.09)bc 91.5 (3.69)a
CMB 7.02 (0.06)e 84.2(2.65)c 8.83 (0.25)a 37.6 (0.40)b
PLB 6.89 (0.04)f 25.1 (2.78)g 8.48 (0.20)b 20.5 (1.87)e
PJB 7.18 (0.10)d 31.8 (2.40)g 8.83 (0.39)a 24.0 (1.72)d
CHB 6.58 (0.03)g 55.9 (2.19)e 8.46 (0.14)b 31.1 (0.81)c
ES 7.74 (0.08)b 61.0 (1.90)e 8.88 (0.02)a 13.2 (1.34)f
LI 7.95 (0.05)a 43.2 (1.89)f 9.09 (0.23)a 10.0 (0.96)g
CON+ 6.51 (0.04)g 73.1 (3.57)d 8.11 (0.04)c 12.7 (0.36)fg
CON 7.41 (0.02)c 106 (6.77)b 8.17 (0.06)bc 30.8 (2.70)c

FMB Faecal matter (Faecal cake) biochar, CMB cow manure biochar, PLB poultry litter biochar, PJB Prosopis juliflora pods biochar, CHB Coffee husk biochar, ES Eggshell waste, LI Lime, CON + spiked control, CON non-spiked control

aPK soil: Silty loam soil; BA soil: Sandy loam soil

bStandard deviation in parentheses (n = 3), values for each soil with different letter within each column are significantly different (P < 0.05)