Table 2.
Species | Defoliation class (code) | Tree-ring width (mm) | First-order autocorrelationa | Mean sensitivitya |
---|---|---|---|---|
Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) | Severe defoliation (D) | 1.93 ± 0.06a | 0.75 ± 0.05a | 0.38 ± 0.04b |
Intermediate defoliation (I) | 2.30 ± 0.12b | 0.75 ± 0.08a | 0.32 ± 0.03b | |
Scarce or no defoliation (N) | 2.32 ± 0.07b | 0.83 ± 0.02b | 0.27 ± 0.04a | |
Black pine (Pinus nigra) | Severe defoliation (D) | 1.52 ± 0.05a | 0.77 ± 0.05 | 0.36 ± 0.01b |
Intermediate defoliation (I) | 2.20 ± 0.13b | 0.75 ± 0.05 | 0.31 ± 0.02a | |
Scarce or no defoliation (N) | 2.22 ± 0.14b | 0.73 ± 0.05 | 0.30 ± 0.02a |
Statistics refer to raw data excepting mean sensitivity which was calculated considering residual indices. Different letters show significant differences (P < 0.05) between defoliation classes within each species according to S-N-K post-hoc tests.
The first-order autocorrelation of raw ring-width data measures how much the ring width in year n is correlated with the width in year n-1; the mean sensitivity of residual tree-ring width series measures the relative year-to-year variability in width of consecutive tree rings.