Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 1;7:418. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00418

Table 2.

Dendrochronological statistics of tree-ring width series for the studied trees and defoliation classes calculated considering the common 1985–2008 period (values are means ± SE).

Species Defoliation class (code) Tree-ring width (mm) First-order autocorrelationa Mean sensitivitya
Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) Severe defoliation (D) 1.93 ± 0.06a 0.75 ± 0.05a 0.38 ± 0.04b
Intermediate defoliation (I) 2.30 ± 0.12b 0.75 ± 0.08a 0.32 ± 0.03b
Scarce or no defoliation (N) 2.32 ± 0.07b 0.83 ± 0.02b 0.27 ± 0.04a
Black pine (Pinus nigra) Severe defoliation (D) 1.52 ± 0.05a 0.77 ± 0.05 0.36 ± 0.01b
Intermediate defoliation (I) 2.20 ± 0.13b 0.75 ± 0.05 0.31 ± 0.02a
Scarce or no defoliation (N) 2.22 ± 0.14b 0.73 ± 0.05 0.30 ± 0.02a

Statistics refer to raw data excepting mean sensitivity which was calculated considering residual indices. Different letters show significant differences (P < 0.05) between defoliation classes within each species according to S-N-K post-hoc tests.

a

The first-order autocorrelation of raw ring-width data measures how much the ring width in year n is correlated with the width in year n-1; the mean sensitivity of residual tree-ring width series measures the relative year-to-year variability in width of consecutive tree rings.