Table 2.
Diversity of Swingle and Reece’s and Tanaka’s lime and lemon species based on the MLG matrix and 123 molecular markers
| Swingle and Reece | Tanaka | n | MLGs | Ho | He | FW |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. aurantifolia (Christm.) Swing. | C. aurantifolia | 6 | 6 | 0·45 ± 0·07 | ||
| C. bergamia | 1 | 1 | 0·39 ± 0·09 | |||
| C. excelsa | 2 | 2 | 0·46 ± 0·09 | |||
| C. limettioides | 3 | 2 | 0·53 ± 0·09 | |||
| C. macrophylla | 1 | 1 | 0·44 ± 0·09 | |||
| Total C. aurantifolia | 13 | 12 | 0·47 ± 0·06 | 0·34 ± 0·04 | –0·30 ± 0·07 | |
| C. limon (L.) Burm. | C. aurata | 1 | 1 | 0·45 ± 0·09 | ||
| C. jambhiri | 1 | 1 | 0·59 ± 0·09 | |||
| C. karna | 2 | 2 | 0·53 ± 0·09 | |||
| C. limetta | 3 | 2 | 0·56 ± 0·09 | |||
| C. limon | 39 | 13 | 0·51 ± 0·08 | |||
| C. limonia | 3 | 3 | 0·58 ± 0·08 | |||
| C. lumia | 3 | 2 | 0·31 ± 0·07 | |||
| C. meyeri | 1 | 1 | 0·55 ± 0·09 | |||
| C. pyriformis | 1 | 1 | 0·25 ± 0·08 | |||
| Total C. limon | 54 | 26 | 0·50 ± 0·06 | 0·34 ± 0·04 | –0·34 ± 0·06 | |
| Citrus species | 15 | 15 | 0·47 ± 0·05 | 0·36 ± 0·04 | –0·26 ± 0·05 | |
| All limes and lemons | 82 | 53 | 0·49 ± 0·05 | 0·37 ± 0·03 | –0·25 ± 0·05 | |
n, number of accessions; MLG, multilocus genotype; Ho, observed heterozygosity; He, expected heterozygosity; FW, Wright’s fixation index.