Table 1.
The activities of tetracyclines against recombinant E. coli expressing major tetracycline-specific resistance mechanisms
MIC (μg/mL) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E. coli lacZ | E. coli tet(M) | E. coli tet(K) | E. coli tet(A) | E. coli tet(B) | E. coli tet(X) | |
Eravacycline | 0.063 | 0.063 | 0.031 | 0.25 | 0.063 | 4 |
Tigecycline | 0.063 | 0.13 | 0.063 | 1 | 0.063 | 2 |
Doxycycline | 2 | 64 | 4 | 32 | 32 | 16 |
Minocycline | 0.5 | 64 | 1 | 8 | 16 | 4 |
Tetracycline | 2 | 128 | 128 | >128 | >128 | 128 |
Ceftriaxone | 0.063 | 0.13 | 0.063 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 |
Genes were overexpressed in E. coli DH10B from a recombinant expression vector under the control of an arabinose promoter. Standardized MIC assays were performed according to CLSI methodology as previously described.
MIC, minimal inhibitory concentration; tet(M), ribosomal protection; tet(K), Gram-positive tetracycline efflux; tet(A) and tet(B), Gram-negative efflux; tet(X), flavin-dependent monooxygenase.
Data is reprinted, with permission, from Grossman et al. (2012).