Table 1.
Sample Characteristics |
Engagement with Psychosocial EBTs |
Engagement with Medication EBTs |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
%/mean | SE | B | SE | B | SE | |
Program Characteristics | ||||||
Program location is rural | 74.0 | 3.17 | 0.001 | 0.14 | 0.04 | 0.26 |
Program is located at a tribal location | 81.3 | 2.82 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.32 | 0.29 |
Type of program1 | ||||||
tribal | 53.1 | 3.60 | −0.03 | 0.15 | −0.42 | 0.28 |
tribal consortium | 9.9 | 2.16 | 0.13 | 0.21 | −0.18 | 0.39 |
IHS or federal | 51.0 | 3.61 | 0.16 | 0.13 | −0.07 | 0.25 |
independent | 25.0 | 3.13 | −0.10 | 0.16 | −0.32 | 0.31 |
Funding1 | ||||||
Direct, 638 compact, block grant, or tribal | 65.6 | 3.43 | 0.53 | 0.13 * | 0.31 | 0.25 |
HRSA or 638 contract | 57.3 | 3.57 | 0.23 | 0.13 | 0.001 | 0.24 |
Grants (SAMHSA or private foundation) | 39.6 | 3.53 | 0.23 | 0.12 | 0.33 | 0.23 |
Medicaid or fee for service | 65.1 | 3.44 | 0.23 | 0.12 | 0.72 | 0.24 * |
Program accredited | 24.5 | 3.10 | 0.07 | 0.14 | 0.37 | 0.26 |
Serves adolescents | 84.4 | 2.62 | −0.19 | 0.17 | 0.65 | 0.31 |
Levels of care provided1 | ||||||
ASAM Level 0.5, early intervention | 64.6 | 3.45 | −0.31 | 0.13 | 0.06 | 0.25 |
ASAM Level I, outpatient treatment | 89.1 | 2.25 | 0.10 | 0.22 | 0.17 | 0.43 |
ASAM Level II, intensive outpatient/partial hospitalization |
34.9 | 3.44 | 0.41 | 0.13 * | 0.02 | 0.25 |
ASAM Level III, residential/inpatient treatment | 19.8 | 2.88 | −0.04 | 0.16 | −0.07 | 0.31 |
ASAM Level IV, medically-managed intensive inpatient treatment |
2.1 | 1.03 | 0.24 | 0.41 | 1.52 | 0.80 |
Program has an electronic health record system | 55.1 | 3.64 | 0.28 | 0.12 | 0.56 | 0.22 * |
Staff Characteristics | ||||||
Number of front line clinical staff | 5.6 | 0.55 | 0.02 | 0.01* | 0.02 | 0.01 |
Number of disciplines among clinical staff | 3.1 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.04* | 0.28 | 0.08 * |
Average years of staff education | 16.4 | 0.11 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.20 | 0.07 * |
Average years of employment in program | 5.6 | 0.26 | −0.01 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.03 |
Staff that are certified addiction counselors | ||||||
none | 10.4 | 2.20 | --A | --A | --A | --A |
1–50% | 46.4 | 3.60 | 0.61 | 0.20 * | 1.05 | 0.38 * |
more than 50% | 43.2 | 3.58 | 0.77 | 0.20* | 0.92 | 0.38 |
Staff in recovery from alcoholism | ||||||
none | 14.6 | 2.55 | --A | --A | --A | --A |
1–50% | 53.1 | 3.60 | 0.31 | 0.17 | 0.80 | 0.33 |
more than 50% | 29.7 | 3.36 | 0.39 | 0.19 | 0.60 | 0.36 |
Percent of clinical staff that are American Indian or Alaska Native |
||||||
none | 16.7 | 2.69 | --A | --A | --A | --A |
1–50% | 44.8 | 3.59 | 0.22 | 0.17 | 0.40 | 0.32 |
more than 50% | 38.5 | 3.51 | 0.16 | 0.18 | −0.08 | 0.33 |
Program struggles to recruit and retain clinical staff | 51.6 | 3.61 | 0.19 | 0.12 | 0.21 | 0.22 |
Program has open clinical staff positions | 38.0 | 3.50 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.34 | 0.23 |
Program has continuing education requirement | 81.3 | 2.82 | 0.47 | 0.15* | 0.56 | 0.29 |
Clinical Assessment and Program Evaluation | ||||||
Structured assessment of client's substance abuse at intake |
76.6 | 3.06 | 0.21 | 0.14 | −0.22 | 0.26 |
Formal method to assess client's motivation for change at intake |
27.5 | 3.46 | 0.44 | 0.14* | 0.59 | 0.27 |
Program evaluates effectiveness of services provided |
65.8 | 3.47 | 0.29 | 0.12 | 0.17 | 0.24 |
Program collects data on treatment outcomes | 64.2 | 3.51 | 0.30 | 0.12* | 0.02 | 0.23 |
Program has outside evaluator examine the quality of services |
40.6 | 3.59 | 0.19 | 0.12 | −0.12 | 0.23 |
Program has participated in a research or program evaluation |
31.6 | 3.40 | 0.35 | 0.13* | 0.31 | 0.24 |
Evidence-Based Treatment Experience and Attitudes | ||||||
Feels pressure to use Evidence-Based Treatments | 36.5 | 3.47 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.06 | 0.23 |
Program requires clinical staff to use Evidence- Based Treatments |
43.8 | 3.58 | 0.43 | 0.12* | 0.30 | 0.23 |
Believes working with an expert in a particular treatment would help improve services |
95.7 | 1.48 | −0.12 | 0.30 | 0.72 | 0.55 |
Evidence-Based Treatments are considered in strategic planning |
58.3 | 3.61 | 0.48 | 0.12* | 0.59 | 0.22 |
EBPAS Openness Subscale | 2.3 | 0.06 | 0.30 | 0.08* | 0.16 | 0.15 |
EBPAS Divergence Subscale | 1.5 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.08 | −0.12 | 0.16 |
Notes.
Percentages sum to more than 100 as participants were permitted to endorse more than one response.
%/Mean=percent for categorical variables, mean for continuous variables
SE=standard error
EBT=Evidence-Based Treatment
p≤.01
A=reference group
EBPAS=Evidence-Based Practices Attitudes Scale