Table 3.
Described results on rated pain, health-related quality of life, and additional endometriosis-related variables in the evaluated studies
Outcome variables, type of comparisons of change before–after treatment | Included studies, number of included patients in analysis
|
||
---|---|---|---|
Rubi-Klein et al,43 n=83 | Wayne et al,41 n=14 | Highfield et al,39 n=2 | |
Rated pain intensity | |||
Within groups | Ratings at the lower half of the scale in the acupuncture group unchanged in placebo group | Ratings at the lower half of the scale in both groups | Decreased rating in both patients |
Between groups | Lower levels in acupuncture group as compared to placebo group | No differences between the groups | |
Rated pain disability | |||
Within groups | Lower rated levels in both groups | – | – |
Between groups | No difference when compared after crossover | ||
Rated HRQOL | |||
Within groups | Increased in seven of eight items of | Increased in acupuncture group | – |
Between groups | SF36 in both groups | No differences | |
Social efficiency, psychological wellbeing higher in acupuncture group than in placebo group | |||
Additional variables | Take home baby rate: 5 (5 of 7) women pregnant women ended their pregnancy successful (group allocation unspecified) Absentee days: decrease in both groups Analgesic intake: decrease in acupuncture group Treatment expectation: rated higher expectation led to more marked decrease of pain intensity (group allocation unspecified) |
Perceived stress: decrease in both groups Inflammatory markers (IL-6, TNFα): no within group or between group differences |
Social activity and attendance in school activity: increased in both patients |
Abbreviations: HRQOL, health-related quality of life; SF36, short form (36); IL, interleukin; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor α.