Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 24;9:1795–1799. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S93687

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate analyses of the prognostic risk factors for overall survival in PTCL

Variable Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
HR (95% CI) P-value HR (95% CI) P-value
ECOG (0–1 vs 2–4) 1.84 (0.25–3.56) 0.031 1.38 (0.82–3.15) 0.635
Ann Arbor stage (I–II vs III–IV) 1.24 (1.35–4.67) 0.134
B symptoms (absent vs present) 2.57 (0.45–7.89) 0.032 0.82 (0.34–2.18) 0.514
β2-MG (normal vs elevated) 0.73 (0.46–3.24) 0.572
LDH (normal vs elevated) 0.59 (0.14–2.31) 0.786
IPI (1–2 vs 3–5) 4.12 (1.59–6.45) 0.028 4.12 (1.36–6.72) 0.01
CCI (0–1 vs ≥2) 3.24 (0.73–6.45) 0.019 3.56 (0.82–4.51) 0.006
Therapeutic evaluation (CR/PR vs SD/PD) 2.38 (0.62–6.42) 0.673

Abbreviations: PTCL, peripheral T-cell lymphoma; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; β2-MG, β-microglobulin; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; IPI, International Prognostic Index; CR, complete remission; PR, partial remission; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease; CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index Score.