Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 30;43(4):1969–1981. doi: 10.1118/1.4943643

FIG. 7.

FIG. 7.

Comparison of SMART and multicoil k-t SLR on a Cartesian dataset retrospectively undersampled with a 16-ray golden ratio sampling pattern. (a) Truth from the fully sampled Cartesian k-space data, (b) image reconstructed using multicoil k-t SLR, and (c) image reconstructed using SMART. (d) Magnitude of the image difference between multicoil k-t SLR in (b) and the fully sample image in (a). (e) Magnitude of the image difference between SMART in (b) and the fully sample image in (a). The normalized mean squared error (MSE) is reported along with the difference image. Both SMART and k-t SLR performed well at reconstructing the image and had similar image quality.