Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Feb;68(2):167–178. doi: 10.1002/acr.22804

Appendix Table 4.

Example of a patient rated “improved” by the experts. Predicted probability of improving is 0.60 according to CRISS.

Baseline Follow-up Absolute change
Age 64.65 years
Disease duration (months) 30.74
Global assessments
Patient global assessment (0–10)* 1 0 −1
Physician global assessment (0–10)* 7 4 −3
Musculoskeletal
HAQ-DI (0–3)* 0.375 0.250 −0.125
Tendon friction rubs* No No No change
Skin
MRSS (0–51)* 21 15 −6
Patient skin interference last month 8 5 −3
Lung
FVC% predicted* 86 81 −5
Breathing VAS (0–10) 0 0 0
Renal
Renal crisis** Yes Yes No change
Gastrointestinal
GI VAS (0–10) 0 0 0
Body Mass Index (BMI) 25.12 24.82 −0.3
Raynaud’s
Raynaud’s VAS (0–10) 3 4 1
Digital ulcers
Digital ulcers VAS (0–10) 0 8 8
Number of digital ulcers 0 0 0
HRQOL
Pain VAS (0–10) 0 2 2
Fatigue (SF-36 Vitality scale) (0–100) 35.12 35.12 0.0
*

included in Step 2;

**

included in Step 1

HAQ-DI= health assessment questionnaire-disability index, MRSS= modified Rodnan skin score, FVC= Forced vital capacity, GI= gastrointestinal, VAS= visual analog scale