Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson. 2016 Feb 4;265:177–187. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2016.01.019

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

R2 changes and temperature dose before (a), during (b), and after motion (c). In moving objects R2 changes may prove more reliable than thermal dose toward detecting tissue damage because the former are made on a frame-by-frame basis while the latter involve a time integral. For this reason, R2 measurements can recover from one or more bad frames while errors in temperature dose will propagate to all future time frames.