Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 2;17:144. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-0996-9

Table 2.

Preoperative and postoperative (final follow-up) data

Preoperative Postoperative P value
Elbow extension degree (n = 11) −17 (±13) −7.2 (±7.6) <.01
 Open surgery (n = 5) −22 (±16) −11 (±8) n.s.
 Arthroscopic surgery (n = 6) −13 (±8.8) −4.2 (±4.9) n.s.
Elbow flexion degree (n = 11) 119 (±11) 132 (±7.4) <.01
 Open surgery (n = 5) 115 (±9) 128 (±8.3) <.05
 Arthroscopic surgery (n = 6) 121 (±13) 134 (±5.8) n.s.
Total arc degree (n = 11) 101 (±22) 125 (±12) <.01
 Open surgery (n = 5) 93 (±20) 117 (±10) <.05
 Arthroscopic surgery (n = 6) 108 (±21) 130 (±9.6) n.s.
Hand20 score (0–100) (n = 11) 52 (±22) 22 (±16) <.01
 Open surgery (n = 5) 49 (±23) 19 (±23) <.01
 Arthroscopic surgery (n = 6) 53 (±20) 20 (±7.8) <.05
JOA-JES score (n = 11) 67 (±6.5) 88 (±6.9) <.01
 Open surgery (n = 5) 63 (±6.1)a 88 (±6.4) <.01
 Arthroscopic surgery (n = 6) 71 (±4.7) 89 (±8) <.01
MEPS (n = 11) 71 (±12) 91 (±10) <.01
 Open surgery (n = 5) 70 (±11) 91 (±13) <.05
 Arthroscopic surgery (n = 6) 74 (±14) 93 (±8.2) <.01
Pain score (0–10) (n = 11) 6.5 (±2) 2.9 (±1.6) <.01
 Open surgery (n = 5) 6 (±2.8) 2.5 (±2.4) <.05
 Arthroscopic surgery (n = 6) 7 (±0.7) 2.6 (±0.5) <.01

Data are expressed as mean (± standard deviation)

JOA-JES score Japanese Orthopaedic Association-Japan Elbow Society Elbow Function Score

MEPS Mayo Elbow Performance Score

n number

n.s. not significant

aThere was a significant difference between the open and arthroscopic surgery groups (P < 0.05)