Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Personal Disord. 2016 Jan 25;7(2):113–123. doi: 10.1037/per0000170

Table 3.

Factor Structure Matrix for Sample 2.

Neuroticism Agreeableness Conscientiousness Extraversion Openness/Intellect
Distress Volatility Exploit-
ativeness
Compassion
vs.
Callousness
Industriousness
vs.
Distractibility
Orderliness Enthusiasm Assertiveness
vs.
Submissiveness
Psychoticism/
Openness
Intellect
Withdrawn Distresss (BFAS) .76 .75 −.16 .04 −.39 −.10 −.33 −.38 .22 −.29
Depressivity .88 .51 .14 −.10 −.47 −.07 −.61 −.08 .43 −.15
Anxiousness .81 .65 −.01 .00 −.38 .11 −.37 −.28 .31 −.17
Separation Insecurity .53 .36 .30 .16 −.41 .11 .08 −.21 .32 −.14
Suspiciousness .58 .51 .26 −.38 −.25 .15 −.47 .09 .35 −.01
Volatility .54 .95 .13 −.09 −.36 .01 −.18 −.05 .22 −.18
Hostility .54 .74 .47 −.35 −.42 .20 −.46 .09 .42 −.02
Emotional Lability .62 .67 .23 .22 −.46 .11 −.09 −.07 .45 −.12
Politeness (BFAS) −.12 −.42 −.56 .67 .33 .06 .08 −.32 −.23 −.18
Manipulativeness .13 .14 .73 −.36 −.23 .17 .08 .03 .29 .38
Deceitfulness .40 .33 .76 −.50 −.40 .01 −.13 −.06 .39 .14
Grandiosity .05 .11 .56 −.42 −.18 .26 −.03 .29 .30 .29
Attention Seeking .08 .12 .58 −.15 −.44 .09 .39 .11 .30 .24
Compassion (BFAS) −.17 −.28 −.28 .79 .28 .08 .48 −.18 −.17 .14
Callousness .38 .36 .62 −.69 −.35 .07 −.39 .26 .42 −.02
Industriousness (BFAS) −.49 −.48 −.08 .09 .78 .45 .29 .22 −.26 .28
Distractibility .60 .44 .26 .01 −.84 −.18 −.37 −.18 .43 −.22
Impulsivity .27 .28 .46 −.14 −.72 −.12 .07 .18 .47 .03
Perseveration .63 .44 .22 −.13 −.69 .21 −.39 −.16 .55 −.14
Irresponsibility .52 .31 .52 −.23 −.69 −.25 −.29 .07 .47 −.09
Orderliness (BFAS) −.03 −.04 −.11 .02 .44 .66 .09 −.02 −.19 −.04
Rigid Perfectionism .28 .23 .12 −.22 −.14 .78 −.27 .00 .33 .06
Enthusiasm (BFAS) −.42 −.34 .10 .52 .15 .10 .90 .09 −.17 .21
Social Withdrawal .50 .34 .03 −.41 −.23 .06 −.97 −.06 .35 −.12
Anhedonia .79 .45 .09 −.26 −.34 −.08 −.78 −.08 .28 −.23
Restricted Affectivity .22 .00 .19 −.66 −.33 .06 −.69 .06 .35 .05
Intimacy Avoidance .35 .16 .14 −.35 −.26 −.01 −.65 .14 .27 −.05
Assertiveness (BFAS) −.41 −.21 .29 −.04 .11 .22 .54 .46 −.04 .57
Submissiveness .41 .20 .15 .18 −.28 .00 −.09 −.42 .13 −.26
Risk Taking −.15 .02 .40 −.25 −.41 −.05 .39 .34 .31 .29
Openness (BFAS) −.11 .00 −.22 .44 .06 .01 .18 .01 .22 .43
Perceptual Dysregulation .58 .36 .38 −.10 −.55 .06 −.20 .05 .79 .03
Unusual Beliefs and Experiences .35 .20 .30 −.02 −.35 .10 −.17 .15 .72 .20
Eccentricity .39 .35 .15 −.12 −.56 .02 −.38 .04 .72 .19
Intellect (BFAS) −.42 −.36 −.10 .18 .42 .16 .16 .21 −.01 .64

Congruence with Sample 1 .98 .98 .97 .96 .96 .93 .97 .90 .97 .94

Note. N = 549. Numbers in bold indicate the highest loading in each row. Italics indicate the BFAS scale that was hypothesized to have the highest loading in each column. Bottom row is Tucker’s congruence coefficient.