Table 3.
Comparison of the clavicle morphology with the literature data.
| Measurements | Groups | Present study | Mathieu, France |
Bernat, Belgium |
Bachoura, USA |
Daruwalla, Ireland |
Huang, USA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L | Total | 144.2 ± 12.0 | 149.4 ± 10.3 | 136.7 ± 10.4 | 145.0 ± 12.7 | ||
| Males | 152.9 ± 9.3 | 152.7 ± 2.9 | 155.8 ± 7.6 | 152.33 | 152.6 ± 10.2 | ||
| Females | 135.6 ± 7.2 | 140.2 ± 1.5 | 142.9 ± 8.4 | 140.34 | 137.3 ± 10.2 | ||
|
| |||||||
| T s | Total | 20.8 ± 6.0 | 25.6 ± 3.1 | ||||
| Males | 21.1 ± 7.5 | 25.7 ± 3.7 | |||||
| Females | 20.6 ± 4.1 | 25.4 ± 3.0 | |||||
|
| |||||||
| T m | Total | 10.5 ± 1.9 | 9.5 ± 1.3 | ||||
| Males | 11.7 ± 1.9 | 10.2 ± 1.2 | 11.69 | ||||
| Females | 9.3 ± 1.0 | 8.7 ± 0.9 | 9.34 | ||||
|
| |||||||
| T a | Total | 14.1 ± 3.8 | 13.6 ± 1.7 | ||||
| Males | 16.3 ± 3.8 | 14.6 ± 1.5 | |||||
| Females | 11.9 ± 2.2 | 12.7 ± 1.3 | |||||
|
| |||||||
| R s | Total | 63.2 ± 12.1 | 66.4 ± 8.0 | ||||
| Males | 66.4 ± 12.8 | 72.1 ± 1.4 | |||||
| Females | 60.0 ± 10.6 | 68.7 ± 1.2 | |||||
|
| |||||||
| R a | Total | 29.4 ± 8.2 | 33.5 ± 10.5 | ||||
| Males | 28.8 ± 8.2 | 37.1 ± 1.2 | |||||
| Females | 30.0 ± 8.1 | 37.8 ± 0.9 | |||||
|
| |||||||
| D s | Total | 17.4 ± 4.0 | |||||
| Males | 19.7 ± 3.0 | 18.4 ± 1.6 | |||||
| Females | 15.2 ± 3.6 | 15.1 ± 1 | |||||
|
| |||||||
| D a | Total | 12.7 ± 3.3 | |||||
| Males | 14.0 ± 3.5 | 12.3 ± 1.5 | |||||
| Females | 11.3 ± 2.5 | 10.2 ± 0.6 | |||||