Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 21;2016:6219761. doi: 10.1155/2016/6219761

Table 3.

Comparison of the clavicle morphology with the literature data.

Measurements Groups Present study Mathieu,
France
Bernat,
Belgium
Bachoura,
USA
Daruwalla,
Ireland
Huang,
USA
L Total 144.2 ± 12.0   149.4 ± 10.3 136.7 ± 10.4   145.0 ± 12.7
Males 152.9 ± 9.3 152.7 ± 2.9 155.8 ± 7.6   152.33 152.6 ± 10.2
Females 135.6 ± 7.2 140.2 ± 1.5 142.9 ± 8.4   140.34 137.3 ± 10.2

T s Total 20.8 ± 6.0   25.6 ± 3.1      
Males 21.1 ± 7.5   25.7 ± 3.7      
Females 20.6 ± 4.1   25.4 ± 3.0      

T m Total 10.5 ± 1.9   9.5 ± 1.3      
Males 11.7 ± 1.9   10.2 ± 1.2   11.69  
Females 9.3 ± 1.0   8.7 ± 0.9   9.34  

T a Total 14.1 ± 3.8   13.6 ± 1.7      
Males 16.3 ± 3.8   14.6 ± 1.5      
Females 11.9 ± 2.2   12.7 ± 1.3      

R s Total 63.2 ± 12.1     66.4 ± 8.0    
Males 66.4 ± 12.8 72.1 ± 1.4        
Females 60.0 ± 10.6 68.7 ± 1.2        

R a Total 29.4 ± 8.2     33.5 ± 10.5    
Males 28.8 ± 8.2 37.1 ± 1.2        
Females 30.0 ± 8.1 37.8 ± 0.9        

D s Total 17.4 ± 4.0          
Males 19.7 ± 3.0 18.4 ± 1.6        
Females 15.2 ± 3.6 15.1 ± 1        

D a Total 12.7 ± 3.3          
Males 14.0 ± 3.5 12.3 ± 1.5        
Females 11.3 ± 2.5 10.2 ± 0.6