Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 21;2016:5964250. doi: 10.1155/2016/5964250

Table 1.

Cross-sectional description of study participants with functional and nociceptive paina.

Functional pain Nociceptive pain
Number of participants (denominator) 68 89
Peg algometry rating from 0 to 10 in 1/2 units
 Mean finger pressure pain (SD) 4.5 (3.0) 1.5 (1.5)
 Mean ear lobe pressure pain (SD) 7.5 (2.5) 4.5 (2.5)
 Range of finger pressure painb 0 to 10 0 to 7
 Range of ear lobe pressure painb 1 to 10 0 to 10
Electronic algometry in kilopascals
 Mean finger pain threshold (SD) 156 (96) 228 (97)
 Mean ear lobe pain threshold (SD) 125 (85) 164 (72)
 Range of finger pain thresholdb 12 to 467 71 to 676
 Range of ear lobe pain thresholdb 2 to 461 47 to 368
Age, sex, pain onset, and pain localization
 Mean age in years (SD) 46 (12) 57 (16)
 Number of women (%) 40 (59) 37 (42)
 Mean pain duration in months (SD) 98 (114) 35 (75)
 Number of pain onsets before the 50th birthday (%) 59 (87) 40 (45)
 Number of patients with multilocular pain (%) 56 (82) 33 (37)
Numeric analogue scales from 0 to 10 in 1/2 units
 Mean intensity of musculoskeletal pain (SD) 6.5 (2.0) 4.0 (2.0)
 Mean mood (SD) 6.0 (2.5) 4.0 (2.0)
Medication
 Number of patients
  With strong opiates (%) 10 (15) 14 (16)
  With weak opiates (%)c 12 (18) 6 (7)
  With nonopiate analgesics only (%) 33 (49) 67 (75)
  Without analgesics (%) 13 (19) 2 (2)
 Number of patients with antidepressants (%) 58 (85) 17 (19)
 Number of patients with antiepileptic drugs (%) 16 (24) 10 (11)

aNo missing data; bno outliers; cweak opiates = tramadol and codeine.